I've been avoiding something, and I think you might be too.
Last week, I caught myself writing the same email for the fourth time. You know that feeling, when you delete everything and start over because it doesn't sound quite right?
I was trapped in this perfectionist loop, trying to craft the 'perfect' message for a potential partnership with a company that could change everything for Belkins.
The stakes felt high. One shot to make the right impression. Every word had to be perfect.
Finally, out of frustration (and honestly, procrastination), I just dumped my messy thoughts into GPT and said:
Help me not sound like a numbers robot (sometimes it can be our prof. deformation).
What came back wasn't what I wrote, but it wasn't not-me either. It was... something in between.
More confident than my voice, but somehow more honest about our challenges than I would have been.
I stared at that response for 10 minutes. Then I sent it. And it worked better than any of my four "perfect" attempts.
That moment made me realize I'd been fighting against something fundamental about the future of work.
So What Is The Stochastic Mindset?
Here's the thing: We've been trained to think like machines. Input → Process → Predictable Output.
But AI doesn't operate that way. AI works probabilistically; it provides you with something close to what you need, often with unexpected enhancements you didn't think to request.
Sequoia Capital calls this the "stochastic mindset," and it's basically the biggest shift in how we use tools since, well, computers became a thing.
The stochastic mindset moves us from having minimal leverage on a task and 100% certainty of its outcome to 100% leverage on a task and far less certainty on the exact manifestation of its outcome.
Consider my email situation: Instead of spending 3 hours crafting one "perfect" message, I spent 10 minutes collaborating with AI to generate something that was 80% me, 20% machine insight—and somehow more effective than anything I could have created alone.
It's like the difference between doing something yourself versus delegating to your smartest teammate. You never get exactly what was in your head, but you often get something better.
The Death of "Getting It Right the First Time"
We've been trained to optimize for certainty. Write the perfect brief. Execute the exact plan. Deliver the precise outcome. This deterministic thinking served us well in the age of predictable tools.
But AI tools don't work that way. They work probabilistically—what Sequoia Capital recently called the "stochastic mindset." Instead of giving you exactly what you ask for, they give you something in the neighborhood of what you need, often with unexpected improvements you didn't know to request.
The stochastic mindset moves us from having minimal leverage on a task and 100% certainty of its outcome to 100% leverage on a task and far less certainty on the exact manifestation of its outcome.
Think about it: When you delegate to a human teammate, you never get exactly what was in your head, either.
You get their interpretation, their improvements, and their perspective. The magic happens in that gap between intention and execution.
Why This Changes Everything (And I Mean Everything)
Here's what I've noticed building Belkins and Folderly while increasingly relying on AI tools:
Our tools imitate us, and then we imitate them.
When your primary way of creating becomes probabilistic, when your design tool suggests variations, your writing assistant offers alternatives, your coding assistant provides multiple approaches, your mind starts operating differently.
You become:
More experimental ("Let me try this approach and see what happens")
More iterative ("This is 70% right, let me refine it")
More comfortable with uncertainty ("I don't know exactly what this will produce, but I trust the process")
I've seen this shift in my team at Folderly. We used to spend weeks perfecting campaign strategies before launching.
Now we generate 5 variations with AI, test them all, and let the data decide. We've become pattern seekers instead of plan followers.
The Builder's Advantage
Fun fact: At companies using Dust (an AI platform for building custom agents), usage patterns literally create heat maps to identify the builders on teams.
The individuals utilizing probabilistic tools are the ones propelling innovation.
This isn't a coincidence. The stochastic mindset is fundamentally the builder mindset:
Iterative: Try, measure, adjust
Experimental: Test multiple approaches
Skeptical: Question outputs and dig deeper
Data-driven: Let results guide decisions
Remember when everyone said "learn to code"? The new version is "learn to think stochastically."
Because in a world where AI handles execution, the premium is on navigating uncertainty.
What This Means for Your Work (Starting Tomorrow)
I don't want to be rude, but I've seen too many smart people fight against this shift instead of riding the wave.
They want AI to be a better calculator when it's actually a creative collaborator.
Here's how to start developing your stochastic mindset:
1. Stop writing perfect prompts. Instead of crafting the "perfect" AI prompt, write a good-enough prompt and iterate on the output. Treat the first response as a starting point, not a final answer.
2. Generate options, don't seek solutions. Ask for 3-5 variations of everything. Whether it's email subject lines, product features, or strategic approaches, probabilistic thinking means exploring the possibility space.
3. Embrace "approximately right". AI tools that excel at getting you 80% of the way there quickly. Learn to love that 80% and use human creativity for the final 20%.
4. Build guardrails, not requirements. Instead of specifying exactly what you want, define what you definitely don't want. Let AI explore within those boundaries.
The Meta Game
Here's what excites me: As we cultivate stochastic thinking for AI collaboration, we are genuinely enhancing our overall thinking.
Uncertainty is here to stay. Market conditions can change overnight. Customer preferences continuously shift. Regulations are evolving. Technology advances in unpredictable ways.
The stochastic mindset isn't just about working with AI—it's about thriving in the 21st century.
Companies that embrace this shift will move faster, adapt more quickly, and discover opportunities that their deterministic competitors miss. They'll become antifragile: not just resistant to change, but strengthened by it.
Your Turn
I'm building a new product at Folderly using entirely AI-first development workflows. (This might be the next paid edition)
No traditional wireframes.
No detailed technical specs. Just iterative collaboration between human intuition and AI capability.
It's messy, but it works. It's uncertain, yet it works. Additionally, it’s the fastest we've ever moved from concept to working prototype.
Pick one project this week. Instead of planning it perfectly, start it probabilistically. Generate options. Iterate rapidly. Embrace the uncertainty.
Let me tell you what happens.
Post-Credit Scene: The Rabbit Hole
Watch This First:
Jensen Huang at CES 2025: "IT teams will become HR departments of AI" - The moment that made me realize we're not just using AI tools, we're managing AI teams.
The Paper That Started It All:
How AlphaGo Changed Human Go Players Forever - A 2023 study showing how superhuman AI actually made human players more creative, not less. Mind-blowing stuff.
Podcast Deep Dive:
Sequoia's Training Data: Gabriel Hubert on the Stochastic Mindset - The conversation that coined the term. Gabriel's insights on how Dust usage patterns reveal organizational builders is pure gold.
The Philosophy Behind It:
Ilya Sutskever at NeurIPS 2024: "The more it reasons, the more unpredictable it becomes" - Why even our most advanced AI systems will remain fundamentally probabilistic.
My Personal Recommendation:
Start with the Jensen Huang clip (2 minutes), then dive into the AlphaGo paper if you want your mind blown about human-AI collaboration.
Bonus to just rest and not work:
What this documentary on Netflix - Cocaine AIR. This is wild, and I never thought that these events could be a true story.
Thanks for reading.
Vlad
Your work sparks thought-provoking reflections on the value of flexibility and the power of embracing uncertainty, not as a setback, but as a hidden strength. It’s a compelling idea, the future may not belong to precision, but to those who can improvise with grace and confidence.
Rather than trying to control every step, you begin to rely on intuition and the ability to adapt swiftly. It reminds me of photography. Where technical settings lay the foundation, but true magic emerges when you let go, experiment freely, and capture moments as they unfold.